Re: Stats collector's idx_blks_hit value is highly misleading in practice

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stats collector's idx_blks_hit value is highly misleading in practice
Date: 2022-02-04 16:18:43
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=MNR=C50NRYCHFmXkj1af2vO_stKXuJ75rc_JVqTiyhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:08 PM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Is this a TODO candidate? What would be a succinct title for it?

I definitely think that it's worth working on. I suppose it follows
that it should go on the TODO list.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-02-04 16:39:12 Re: Stats collector's idx_blks_hit value is highly misleading in practice
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2022-02-04 16:09:44 Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS