| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing |
| Date: | 2023-05-02 04:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=DsKWiPHj0KS-KVFP4KTb5zcN0_2bQC6dAFnVVQGU-qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:04 PM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh that's rich. I'll note that 5% of your review was actually helpful (actual correction), the other 95% was needless distraction trying to enlist me in your holy crusade against the term "wraparound". It had the opposite effect.
I went back and checked. There were exactly two short paragraphs about
wraparound terminology on the thread associated with the patch you're
working on, towards the end of this one email:
https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzm2fpPQ_=pXpRvkNiuTYBGTAUfxRNW40kLitxj9T3Ny7w@mail.gmail.com
In what world does that amount to 95% of my review, or anything like it?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-05-02 05:57:05 | Re: ssl tests aren't concurrency safe due to get_free_port() |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-05-02 04:16:21 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |