Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date: 2018-08-09 05:08:26
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=BBiSAB2srBtbW1eEGgMdZR-623Jd6kTKz-Lo+ZzQijA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Typically not, but I don't think that we can rule it out right away.
>
> Hmmm ... maybe we should temporarily stick in an elog(LOG) showing whether
> a parallel build happened or not, so that we can check the buildfarm logs
> next time we see that failure?

I can do that tomorrow. Of course, it might be easier to just push the
pending fix for the mapped relation bug, and see if that makes the
issue go away. That would take longer, but it's also the only thing
that's likely to be definitive anyway.

If you want to go ahead with it yourself, I suggest modifying the
DEBUG1 elog()s within index_build() to be LOG elevel.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-08-09 07:00:29 Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-09 05:03:34 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes