Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date: 2017-03-09 21:06:07
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=8LAMJT_Oy5Cny0s0oz=7dJ0v=COAoE08_r2xwD5Kxdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> In the meantime, here is a new patch series addressing the other
> things you raised.

Please see my remarks on 0007-hj-shared-buf-file-v7.patch over on the
"on_dsm_detach() callback and parallel tuplesort BufFile resource
management" thread. They still apply to this latest version of the
patch series.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-03-09 21:11:21 Re: Cost model for parallel CREATE INDEX
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-09 21:05:14 compiler warning in set_tablefunc_size_estimates