| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples |
| Date: | 2019-04-29 18:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=7aqJ4k6JAqOkoA2uMFVRczv_TMYAxLX=kB8YgXd-0-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:24 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I don't think that anybody cares about Win64 very much.
>
> I seriously doubt this assertion. Note that the postgres packages on
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/windows/ do not support 32bit
> windows anymore (edb from 11 onwards, bigsql apparently always). And I
> think there's a pretty substantial number of windows users out there.
I was talking about the motivation behind this thread, and I suppose
that I included you in that based on things you've said about Windows
in the past (apparently I shouldn't have done so).
I am interested in making the code less complicated. If we can remove
the work_mem kludge for Windows as a consequence of that, then so much
the better.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-04-29 18:45:05 | Re: generate documentation keywords table automatically |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-04-29 18:28:34 | Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples |