Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Date: 2017-08-30 20:23:20
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=7A2G1GduHea5su60HBTiQd1qVQ_KkeVASPbezVLz0vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> These are separate topics. They should each be discussed on their own
> thread. Please don't hijack this thread to talk about something else.

I don't think that that is a fair summary.

Heikki has done a number of things in this area, of which this is only
the latest. I'm saying "hey, have you thought about RS too?". Whether
or not I'm "hijacking" this thread is, at best, ambiguous.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-08-30 21:28:40 Re: Parallel worker error
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-30 20:18:35 Re: The case for removing replacement selection sort