Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library?
Date: 2023-11-22 23:17:49
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=3_=1jtfis5Y-M2cfu=v6a-wZquozCWGKEAmkCtDfbVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:59 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Much appreciated! I can put this to good use.

I was just reminded of how our existing backtrace support is lacklustre.

Are you planning on submitting a patch for this?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-23 00:01:32 Re: [HACKERS] Changing references of password encryption to hashing
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-11-22 22:59:45 Re: common signal handler protection