Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names
Date: 2021-01-04 21:56:23
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=2zDD+AYDSfXao0f2FsfXczSw3km7aY5Ccapy8ySJN8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 1:12 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I personally mildly prefer remxid - anything that is understandable but
> shortens the line length is good for my uses of waldump.

I want to use latestRemovedXid here because it is quite recognizable
to me as a symbol name. It appears as a symbol name 84 times, across
many files in several distinct areas. Whereas remxid means nothing to
me unless I go look it up, which is not ideal.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-01-04 22:06:01 Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-01-04 21:12:03 Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names