Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> would be working on a leaf partition chosen by tuple-routing after an
> insert on a partitioned table. The leaf partitions can very well have a
> unique index, which can be used for inference. The problem however is
> that infer_arbiter_indexes() in the optimizer would be looking at the root
> partitioned, which cannot yet have any indexes defined on them, let alone
> unique indexes. When we develop a feature where defining an index on the
> root partitioned table would create the same index on all the leaf
> partitions and then extend it to support unique indexes, then we can
> perhaps talk about supporting ON CONFLICT handing. Does that make sense?

Yes, that makes sense, but I wasn't arguing that that should be
possible today. I was arguing that when you don't spell out an
arbiter, which ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING permits, then it should be
possible for it to just work today -- infer_arbiter_indexes() will
return immediately.

This should be just like the old approach involving inheritance, in
that that should be possible. No?

--
Peter Geoghegan