| From: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention |
| Date: | 2017-06-22 02:06:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAGz5QCLaStfnQJ335XA3zdbeKs=JpHBMqpM6X3e2Ujpxw-5iGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> How do these counts compare to the other wait events? For example
> CLogControlLock, which is what Amit's patch [1] is about?
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/84c22fbb-b9c4-a02f-384b-b4feb2c67193%402ndquadrant.com
>
Hello Tomas,
I'm really sorry for this late reply. I've somehow missed the thread.
Actually, I've seen some performance improvement with the
CLogControlLock patch. But, then it turned out all the improvements
were because of the CLogControlLock patch alone.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2017-06-22 02:10:36 | Re: An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-22 01:30:06 | Re: ASOF join |