Re: Custom reloptions and lock modes

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Subject: Re: Custom reloptions and lock modes
Date: 2019-09-20 06:29:13
Message-ID: CAGz5QCLZZsm_mcRfydYYc=Wvha3Ccurq5mPiAaJ1R2bpc4NdbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Hence attached is a patch set to address those issues:
> - 0001 makes sure that any existing module creating a custom reloption
> has the lock mode set to AccessExclusiveMode, which would be a sane
> default anyway. I think that we should just back-patch that and close
> any holes.
Looks good to me. The patch solves the issue and passes with
regression tests. IMHO, it should be back-patched to all the branches.

> - 0002 is a patch which we could use to extend the existing reloption
> APIs to set the lock mode used. I am aware of the recent work done by
> Nikolay in CC to rework this API set, but I am unsure where we are
> going there, and the resulting patch is actually very short, being
> 20-line long with the current infrastructure. That could go into
> HEAD. Table AMs have been added in v12 so custom reloptions could
> gain more in popularity, but as we are very close to the release it
> would not be cool to break those APIs. The patch simplicity could
> also be a reason sufficient for a back-patch, and I don't think that
> there are many users of them yet.
>
I think this is good approach for now and can be committed on the HEAD only.

One small thing:

add_int_reloption(bl_relopt_kind, buf,
"Number of bits generated for each index column",
- DEFAULT_BLOOM_BITS, 1, MAX_BLOOM_BITS);
+ DEFAULT_BLOOM_BITS, 1, MAX_BLOOM_BITS,
+ AccessExclusiveLock);
Do we need a comment to explain why we're using AccessExclusiveLock in
this case?

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-20 07:08:52 Re: Custom reloptions and lock modes
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2019-09-20 05:58:10 Re: dropdb --force