Re: Incorrect fsync handling in pg_basebackup's tar_finish

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect fsync handling in pg_basebackup's tar_finish
Date: 2018-06-25 13:51:27
Message-ID: CAGz5QC+nsqyDtiJ08Zbd3ekorCuYZLa8W48A_PkzfCD0rc9O-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Yes, there is a second one. I just looked at walmethods.c and I did not
> spot any other issues. What do you think about the updated version
> attached?
> --
I've also verified the same. The patch looks good to me.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaurav Mishra 2018-06-25 13:54:50 Regarding the correct and best way to fetching a tablename in contrib module
Previous Message Chris Howard 2018-06-25 13:38:17 Re: comma to delimit fractional seconds