Re: WAL consistency check facility

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date: 2016-08-23 05:15:04
Message-ID: CAGz5QC+d5wkGLt_B_Kn7SeLfrsWS+kW5DOyrx3sb1_daTO7oTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes, I've verified the outputs and log contents after running gmake
installcheck and gmake installcheck-world. The status of the test was
marked as pass for all the testcases.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 22 August 2016 at 13:44, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Please let me know your thoughts on this.
>
> Do the regression tests pass with this option enabled?
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-08-23 05:27:39 Re: WAL consistency check facility
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-08-23 04:32:01 Re: WAL consistency check facility