Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-05-18 13:55:54
Message-ID: CAGnEboiRvMQeyHW4RqtY8Lb4vVTT6hKg_eCEnM=J+yXm3sETVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2016-05-18 16:45 GMT+03:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> No, that's what the existing FREEZE option does. This new option is
> about unnecessarily vacuuming pages that don't need it. The
> expectation is that vacuuming all-frozen pages will be a no-op.
>

VACUUM (INCLUDING ALL) ?

--
Victor Y. Yegorov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-05-18 13:59:57 Improve BEGIN tab completion
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-05-18 13:55:36 Re: memory layouts for binary search in nbtree