Great! That's what exactly we need.
The patch LGTM, +1
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 于2024年1月13日周六 04:47写道：
> I wrote:
> > This is uncomfortably much in bed with the tuple table slot code,
> > perhaps, but I don't see a way to do it more cleanly unless we want
> > to add some new provisions to that API. Andres, do you have any
> > thoughts about that?
>
> Oh! After nosing around a bit more I remembered systable_recheck_tuple,
> which is meant for exactly this purpose. So v4 attached.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>