| From: | wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Change default of jit to off |
| Date: | 2026-01-31 03:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAGjGUA+WYmXLHb5=DDKi5NPY+nGJ96dB=9xSTkzuc7gxSJYwuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Agree +1，Open it again if necessary.
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 21:27, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 30.01.2026 um 12:28 +0100 schrieb Jelte Fennema-Nio:
> > > People have also seen blog articles saying «JIT is bad, switch it
> > > off» that are
> > > right if you are in the wrong use cases for JIT. Which, to be fair,
> > > is not
> > > easy to figure out.
> >
> > +1 on disabling jit by default. At the FOSDEM Postgres developer
> > meeting
> > consensus was hugely in favor of changing the default. So attached is
> > a
> > trivial patch that does this.
>
> +1, let's turn it off. I've seen many people hit by JIT and someone who
> has the use case for it can easily turn it on again.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Bernd
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-01-31 03:44:55 | Re: More speedups for tuple deformation |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-01-31 02:47:49 | Re: More speedups for tuple deformation |