Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

From: li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date: 2022-12-13 02:37:15
Message-ID: CAGfChW4vxVCgWs2=b+SDag0j3G-3Aqw5XvKnHVAReB-iysyj+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

I noticed that the issue of ownership seems to have not been considered.
For example, if a user 'a' from the publishing side creates a table t1,
the owner of t1 is not user 'a' after it is replicated to the subscribing side.
This is a situation that has not been encountered in previous DML replication.

I think the ownership relationship should not be lost,
and we should perhaps add it back,
like pg_dump "ALTER TABLE public.t1 OWNER TO a;",
even though we do not currently support the replication of USER.

Thought? li jie.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message higherone 2022-12-13 08:28:40 Re: Is there a way to know write statistics on an individual index
Previous Message Zheng Li 2022-12-12 22:49:26 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-12-13 03:33:51 Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding
Previous Message Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) 2022-12-13 02:28:49 RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)