| From: | Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adam Berlin <aberlin(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C testing for Postgres |
| Date: | 2019-06-29 05:11:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAGf+fX4hzpfkzT816jgMpfSNjyWc0_JZARCMVmQi1MO2Yk8AsQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:37 AM Adam Berlin <aberlin(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>
> If we were to use this tool, would the community want to vendor the
> framework in the Postgres repository, or keep it in a separate
> repository that produces a versioned shared library?
>
If the library is going to actively evolve, we should bring it into the
tree. For a project like this, a "versioned shared library" is a massive
pain in the rear for both the consumer of such libraries and for their
maintainers.
Cheers,
Jesse
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-06-29 05:40:01 | Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-06-29 02:30:31 | Re: BUG #15858: could not stat file - over 4GB |