Re: Primary node detection race at clean startup

> Done.

Thanks!

> Note that the credits section in the commit message is as follows:
>
> Reported-by: Emond Papegaaij <emond(dot)papegaaij(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Reported-by: Claude Code
> Author: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGXsc%2BZmBoLs3Mz%3DG-Bdm4JJG%2BfH1NpHfR3qVJVwW4eBKWwStQ%40mail.gmail.com
> Backpatch-through: v4.3
>
> You are credited as a reporter, and Claude Code is also a reporter to
> indicate that the report was created by AI. I credited myself as the
> author. This is by following reasons:
>
> 1) AI cannot be the author.
> 2) The committer (me) is responsible for the commit.

Yes, that makes perfect sense. By default Claude adds a
'Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context)
<noreply(at)anthropic(dot)com>'. I totally agree that as a human, you are
responsible for the final commit. AI is a very powerful tool, but it's
still just a tool. At our company, we have a very simple rule: ask
yourself if you're proud of the work you've created. If you're not,
then don't commit.

Best regards,
Emond