Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: Eyal Wilde <eyal(at)impactsoft(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)
Date: 2012-04-13 17:52:45
Message-ID: CAGTBQpamMUQZGAeVEykun7t+uz86Pr9_crvgCvJNMUFmiTtJUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Steve Crawford
<scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, the fact that temporary and unlogged cannot be simultaneously
> specified *is* documented:
>
> CREATE [ [ GLOBAL | LOCAL ] { TEMPORARY | TEMP } | UNLOGGED ] TABLE [ IF NOT
> EXISTS ] table_name
>
> But it would probably be worth adding a note under the description of
> temporary tables that they are, in fact, unlogged.

Yes, it was quite subtle, but you're right. I should've read the
syntax more closely.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-04-14 01:16:43 Re: Slow fulltext query plan
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2012-04-13 17:49:07 Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)