|From:||Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>|
|Cc:||Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> * Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > > They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
>> > > pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
>> > >
>> > > It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
>> > > review myself after that?
>> > Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
>> > status of the patch yourself.
>> We're now over a month since this status update- Claudio, for this to
>> have a chance during this commitfest to be included (which, personally,
>> I think would be great as it solves a pretty serious issue..), we really
>> need to have it be rebased and updated. Once that's done, as Michael
>> says, please change the patch status back to 'Needs Review'.
> Sorry, had tons of other stuff that took priority.
> I'll get to rebase this patch now.
Huh. That was simpler than I thought.
Attached rebased versions.
|Next Message||Ildar Musin||2018-01-17 20:17:45||Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench|
|Previous Message||Geoff Winkless||2018-01-17 20:14:26||Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit|