Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> * Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > > They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
>> > > pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
>> > >
>> > > It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
>> > > review myself after that?
>> >
>> > Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
>> > status of the patch yourself.
>>
>> We're now over a month since this status update- Claudio, for this to
>> have a chance during this commitfest to be included (which, personally,
>> I think would be great as it solves a pretty serious issue..), we really
>> need to have it be rebased and updated. Once that's done, as Michael
>> says, please change the patch status back to 'Needs Review'.
>>
>
> Sorry, had tons of other stuff that took priority.
>
> I'll get to rebase this patch now.
>
>
>
Huh. That was simpler than I thought.

Attached rebased versions.