Re: RFC: Async query processing

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Async query processing
Date: 2014-04-22 17:03:49
Message-ID: CAGTBQpYbUo1_b_ntXMX3BiKWEFXZ9CKRNgA3yRT7vYZ5w+SzLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> Feedback in this thread was, "we want something like this in libpq, but not
> the thing you proposed". But there have been no concrete counter-proposals,
> and some of the responses did not take into account the inherent
> complexities of round-trip avoidance. So I'm not sure how to move this
> topic forward.

What exactly do you mean by not taking into account?

I do not believe you responded to my proposed interface. I'm not
requesting a change in roundtrip avoidance measures, just the
interface.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-04-22 17:04:31 Re: Implied BETWEEN from join quals
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-22 17:02:59 Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6