From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Charles Nadeau <charles(dot)nadeau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Very poor read performance, query independent |
Date: | 2017-07-18 17:13:58 |
Message-ID: | CAGTBQpYQw9V4QdC_m-TW-61Ode_eBpWQuikCEA0q9cFqtc+LvA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Charles Nadeau
> <charles(dot)nadeau(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Claudio,
>>
>> At one moment
>> during the query, there is a write storm to the swap drive (a bit like this
>> case:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi%3Diw4fC2RgTxhw0aGpyXANhOT%3DXBnjLU1_v6PdA%40mail.gmail.com)
>> I can hardly explain it as there is plenty of memory on this server.
>
> That sounds a lot like NUMA zone_reclaim issues:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/500616CB.3070408@2ndQuadrant.com
I realize you have zone_reclaim_mode set to 0. Still, the symptoms are
eerily similar.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2017-07-18 18:01:52 | Re: Very poor read performance, query independent |
Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-07-18 16:01:29 | Re: Very poor read performance, query independent |