Re: Performance on large, append-only tables

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
Date: 2012-02-10 16:58:13
Message-ID: CAGTBQpYA9vwL1g2LwpK_bDVwHh_t76JV52E2wFJmk2G5qtjTrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:45 PM, David Yeu <david(dot)yeu(at)skype(dot)net> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> That, and an index on "(group_id, created_at) where (deleted_at IS
>> NULL)" to catch the sorted by date kind of query, and you'll be done I
>> think.
>
> Yeah, I didn't quite get that right -- we're actually sorting all these queries by "id DESC", not "created_at DESC", so that seems to obviate the need for any index on created_at.

From your OP:

> * Š WHERE group_id = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Yeu 2012-02-10 17:00:50 Re: Performance on large, append-only tables
Previous Message David Yeu 2012-02-10 16:45:39 Re: Performance on large, append-only tables