Re: Add a permission check to pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add a permission check to pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()
Date: 2026-09-25 04:22:09
Message-ID: CAGRkXqTAq1AhL6Y2XqQC-hh0BM2YYBL6WzOcfwESkv3rrdg_nQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael,

> Let me doubt you here. For one, it makes the API contract of
> ProcNumberGetTransactionIds() much harder to think about.

Fair enough, let's drop 0002. Attached is v12, which is v11-0001 alone
and unchanged.

Thanks,
Shihao

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Make-per-backend-statistics-functions-respect-st.patch application/octet-stream 16.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2026-09-25 04:32:11 Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can silently lose updates when the toast table is rewritten
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-09-25 04:08:27 Re: Persist slot invalidations before publishing them