Re: two statement_timeout race conditions

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: two statement_timeout race conditions
Date: 2026-11-15 03:57:28
Message-ID: CAGRkXqSwfWBgGPP-NdTXnrga6uCbCy8jvfOZhEPi6xiBLjnNZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tomas,

Thanks for working on this. Both races already have a thread.

The second is Jelte's CF entry [1]

The first is what I posted in September [2], where a parallel hash join
hits it. Given we already start review your patch, so I am happy to drop my
0002,
but the 0001 is not covered here.

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5070/
[2]
https://postgr.es/m/CAGRkXqQ7d+B+XDCNR0oUmG55EJ421HPj3saWONU2Uc0VKqARWg@mail.gmail.com

Thanks,
Shihao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2026-11-15 04:06:38 Re: Prevent foreign key references to unlogged partitions
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-11-15 03:50:16 Re: Re: Assertion failure in WAL summarizer