Re: Correct documentation for protocol version

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Bauman <danielbaniel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Date: 2026-09-10 03:39:07
Message-ID: CAGRkXqRJY4VarpTsX2KJHSCeJCszeCDKCZoLv3KPvR_2XbkZmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Dave, Jelte,

Going through the open CommitFest I found two entries pointing at this
thread: #5783 (Dave, "Fix Protocol documentation") and #5863 (Jelte,
"docs: Include protocol version changes made without a version bump or
extension").

#5863 is Ready for Committer, and reading the thread it looks like
Jelte's series already covers the NegotiateProtocolVersion correction
that Dave's original patch made.

If that's right, should #5783 be withdrawn as superseded? Two
overlapping doc entries on one thread is confusing for whoever picks
this up.

Thanks,
Shihao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2026-09-10 03:43:12 Re: pgstat: Flush some statistics within running transactions, take 2
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-09-10 03:35:40 Re: SQL/PGQ: Support multi-pattern path matching in GRAPH_TABLE