| From: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Report index currently being vacuumed in pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Date: | 2026-10-01 03:18:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAGRkXqRH8Wh50cVfvwxyZfctTjzCN-j9xCWOSmk9T-0fbUGBXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I've looked at v7, and my main comment is that this is bloated in
> terms of docs and comments.
+1 for v8. I tested serial, parallel and parallel autovacuum. The view
matches the new docs.
> + * they report progress for the index they are processing.
>
> This reads a bit weird as well..
Maybe this:
* Parallel vacuum workers perform only index vacuum or index cleanup,
* so their progress row only shows the phase and the current index.
Thanks,
Shihao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-10-01 03:25:07 | Re: Session in aborted transaction misses effective_wal_level change |
| Previous Message | Grigorev Jurij | 2026-10-01 03:18:11 | Re: BUG #19599: RestoreBlockImage: the decode cross-checks never bound hole_offset + hole_length against BLCKSZ |