Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, saurabh singh <saurabh(dot)singh214(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-11-01 14:47:45
Message-ID: CAGRkXqR4Qs-8uiQnQ_O6EC+hD-LZR=T52wbeppgkdgmXaFkkEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

Thanks for addressing all of them.

Lgtm

Thanks,
Shihao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-11-01 15:31:19 Re: Incremental backup can use a summary past a timeline switch
Previous Message Jim Jones 2026-11-01 14:27:00 Re: PoC: Simplify recovery after dropping a table by LOGGING the restore LSN