| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets |
| Date: | 2020-11-18 03:05:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAGRY4nx799N6gwUa26UVVL+QHyFsJh9yfO1sLawnVff10A3tLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:28 PM Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> During the discussion on Unix-domain sockets on Windows, someone pointed
> out[0] abstract Unix-domain sockets.
>
This reminds me on a somewhat random note that SSPI mode authentication
should work out of the box for unix domain sockets on Windows.
The main reason we probably can't use it as a default is that SSPI isn't
easy to implement for pure language drivers, it requires Windows API calls
to interact with the windows auth services. It's a pain in JDBC for example.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-11-18 03:35:39 | Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets |
| Previous Message | kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com | 2020-11-18 02:40:07 | RE: Terminate the idle sessions |