| From: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |
| Date: | 2025-03-12 10:04:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAGPqQf3H2TN-+Lc3v2BJ=gYcZgy+M-BsOH_SMfk86AuB4pp-hw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 3:20 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 2025-Mar-12, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > If the test passes for you, can you please try the patches at [1] on
> > top of your patches? Please apply those, set and export environment
> > variable PG_TEST_EXTRA=regress_dump_test, and run 002_pg_upgrade test?
> > I intended to do this but can not do it since the test always fails
> > with your patches applied.
>
> Oh, I need to enable a PG_TEST_EXTRA option in order for the test to
> run? FFS. That explains why the tests passed just fine for me.
> I'll re-run.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland —
> https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
> "La conclusión que podemos sacar de esos estudios es que
> no podemos sacar ninguna conclusión de ellos" (Tanenbaum)
>
I can reproduce the issue and will be sending the patch soon.
Thanks Alvaro, Ashutosh.
Rushabh Lathia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-03-12 10:05:24 | Re: Parallel heap vacuum |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2025-03-12 10:03:41 | Re: dblink query interruptibility |