| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(dot)hagander(at)redpill-linpro(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Date: | 2024-03-27 14:43:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQTfMbDiM6W3av+3weSnHxJvPmuTEcjxVvSt91sQBdOxuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 02:24, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Agree. I don’t think “_command” adds much clarity.
Alright, changed the GUC name to "allow_alter_system" since that seems
to have the most "votes". One other option would be to call it simply
"alter_system", just like "jit" is not called "allow_jit" or
"enable_jit".
But personally I feel that the "allow_alter_system" is clearer than
plain "alter_system" for the GUC name.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0002-Add-allow_alter_system-GUC.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.7 KB |
| v7-0001-Rename-COMPAT_OPTIONS_CLIENT-to-COMPAT_OPTIONS_OT.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-03-27 14:54:05 | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-27 14:41:42 | Re: pgsql: Allow using syncfs() in frontend utilities. |