| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(dot)hagander(at)redpill-linpro(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Date: | 2024-03-27 15:05:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaSHOCBiH6SM0dEi9U=CLniXHO8E8qqsg4A3pyUtYF7KA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:43 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Alright, changed the GUC name to "allow_alter_system" since that seems
> to have the most "votes". One other option would be to call it simply
> "alter_system", just like "jit" is not called "allow_jit" or
> "enable_jit".
>
> But personally I feel that the "allow_alter_system" is clearer than
> plain "alter_system" for the GUC name.
I agree, and have committed your 0001.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-27 15:05:57 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-03-27 15:01:28 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |