Re: Type assertions without GCC builtins

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Type assertions without GCC builtins
Date: 2026-06-17 12:22:12
Message-ID: CAGECzQTC8bEajajf8Rto5E7JveaRvF4vxG1+mjsQ6Qy-tZw93w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 at 12:46, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Here is an updated and expanded patch set.

Those patches look good to me. Let's get them in early in the PG20
cycle. It might be nice to still add pg_expr_has_type_p, and just make
it error hard in C++ for now. Because I'll want to use that macro in
another patchset. But I'd also be fine with creating that macro at the
same time as the C++ version.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2026-06-17 12:27:25 Re: Unexpected behavior after OOM errors
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2026-06-17 12:13:03 Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness