Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Date: 2025-06-24 08:36:09
Message-ID: CAGECzQSwbY_Xtn15J1DtzHpKqFJRObkDLCx5KTU44tgwrV8w6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 01:44, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> One example is Amazon RDS Proxy.

Okay, that sounds widely used enough to continue that we should
probably change the new PG18 behaviour of PQgetCancel and
PQcancelCreate like I suggested. Failing all psycopg2 connection
attempts against AWS its proxy service doesn't seem like something
we'd want to do.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-06-24 08:42:49 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-06-24 08:27:28 Re: [PATCH] Fix OAuth feature detection on OpenBSD+Meson