Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed
Date: 2025-08-13 20:27:04
Message-ID: CAGECzQSSskLnB5kNNR7KPAxNd5HbRR2hB+_Gk3-W6v5xD9Gw3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 16:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> writes:
> > I keep an eye on my patches using cfbog [1] and I think since recently
> > it started to mistakenly mark patches as "needs rebase" while in fact
> > everything is OK. If we take [2] for instance, it applies fine:
>
> Yeah, I have observed the same with my patches (according to [1],
> two of 'em need rebase right now, though the underlying 'git am' logs
> report success). In some past occurrences the gripe has gone away
> without my doing anything...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/tom-lane.html

Took a quick look, and publicly noting my findings: Interestingly none
of these patches show up as "needs rebase" in the commitfest app. So
it seems that this is a cfbot webpage generation bug.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-08-13 21:07:07 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2025-08-13 20:06:16 Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)