Re: Feature freeze timezone change request

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze timezone change request
Date: 2026-03-19 12:28:07
Message-ID: CAGECzQSA_1htgbLyb-5+=iNcQJx+Aojyo0OPm8FOesegM6HtTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 at 10:48, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I don't think the end of the commitfest and feature freeze need to be
> the same thing. The commitfest might as well end on 31 March or 1 April.

I think it's fine for the feature freeze to end at a 12:00 UTC instead
of 0:00 UTC. But I think the commitfest should end after the feature
freeze, not before. Otherwise patches will show up as committed in
PG20-1 when in fact they are part of the PG19 release.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2026-03-19 12:39:26 Re: More speedups for tuple deformation
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-03-19 12:25:41 Re: Adding locks statistics