Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date: 2024-03-08 15:42:34
Message-ID: CAGECzQR1QThBQATbgRGDROAzOwzU9TaWEZiZ8dsiD5xbezq7pA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 14:42, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> My documentation comments from upthread still
> stands, but other than those this version LGTM.

Ah yeah, I forgot about those. Fixed now.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Add-backtrace_functions_min_level.patch application/octet-stream 6.7 KB
v6-0002-Add-wildcard-support-to-backtrace_functions-GUC.patch application/octet-stream 2.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-03-08 15:44:26 Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-03-08 15:40:42 Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip