Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2022-06-29 09:44:00
Message-ID: CAGECzQQtrV8fWS30LcK+Ru1Q4FY9uSJPLg+KvyvzQGvmHG=AfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> See upthread in ef5c7896-20cb-843f-e91e-0ee5f7fd932e(at)enterprisedb(dot)com

I saw that section, but I thought that only applied before you
backpatched the actual fixes to PG13 and below. I mean there's no
reason anymore not to compile those older versions with OpenSSL 3.0,
right? If so, it seems confusing for the build to spit out warnings
that indicate the contrary.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-06-29 09:47:09 RE: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-06-29 09:25:59 Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility