Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals
Date: 2025-12-09 09:08:49
Message-ID: CAGECzQQkuJQq57G-P=r__7zSVa8P4r029kuAGvSUWq19q7DgJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 23:08, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thx for the comments.

One more comment: It would be good to enable tracing[1][2] for your
test, especially because I think you still need to update the tracing
logic in libpq for your new packet type.

[1]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/f00484c170f56199c3eeacc82bd72f8c1e3baf6b/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/README#L29-L34
[2]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/f00484c170f56199c3eeacc82bd72f8c1e3baf6b/src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/t/001_libpq_pipeline.pl#L39-L42

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-12-09 09:10:39 Re: Safer hash table initialization macro
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2025-12-09 08:58:52 Re: log_min_messages per backend type