| From: | Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf |
| Date: | 2023-01-11 08:59:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQL2zuFxy+nnfouR0y+N0oMsmpMysjgCmQj3aT1116kBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm working on a new patchset for my commitfest entry. I'll make sure
to include a third patch for the +group support, and I'll include you
(Andrew) in the thread when I send it.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 02:14, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:42:19AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Ok, that sounds reasonable, but the cfbot doesn't like patches that
> > depend on other patches in a different email. Maybe you can roll this up
> > as an extra patch in your next version? It's pretty small.
>
> This can go two ways if both of you agree, by sending an updated patch
> on this thread based on the other one.. And actually, Jelte's patch
> has less C code than this thread's proposal, eventhough it lacks
> tests.
> --
> Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema | 2023-01-11 09:04:56 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] Support using "all" for the db user in pg_ident.conf |
| Previous Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-01-11 08:56:28 | RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |