| From: | Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Deleting prepared statements from libpq. |
| Date: | 2023-06-19 09:50:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQJWJ8ZUPSurtd5R4Zc4zwPUdWtJntA0432UZe5Vwj=Cg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 11:44, Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Done
Now with the actual attachment.
PS. Another connection pooler (PgCat) now also supports prepared
statements, but only using Close not DEALLOCATE:
https://postgresml.org/blog/making-postgres-30-percent-faster-in-production
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Support-sending-Close-messages-from-libpq.patch | application/x-patch | 20.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-06-19 10:03:37 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2023-06-19 09:49:48 | Re: Do we want a hashset type? |