| From: | Sho Ito <i(dot)sho(dot)0628(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v1] Fix tab completion for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2026-10-21 05:12:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAG7L5+6yOBybhKPqJCvMMUmKSRj7MCNLjgH-B1gkk7MUZLHt+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 9:21 AM shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Since RESTRICT is the default, it may not help much, and
> "DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF " plus Tab becomes
> "IF RESTRICT". Maybe we could just remove the rule?
>
Hi Shihao,
Agreed. Since `RESTRICT` is the default, there is little benefit in offering
it here. I'll remove the rule in v2.
Thanks for the review!
Sho
--
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
*Sho Ito (Sean)*
E-mail: i(dot)sho(dot)0628(at)gmail(dot)com
LinkedIn: *https://www.linkedin.com/in/sho-ito-0628/
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/sho-ito-0628/>*
GitHub: https://github.com/sean0628/
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Fix-tab-completion-for-DROP-INDEX-CONCURRENTLY.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-10-21 05:16:48 | Re: [PG19] Promotion hangs behind a backend blocked on a stuck client |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2026-10-21 04:12:41 | nodeWindowAgg.c IGNORE NULLS abs overflow |