| From: | Sho Ito <i(dot)sho(dot)0628(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | imchifan(at)163(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19714: pgcrypto pgp_sym_encrypt accepts nonnumeric s2k-mode as mode 0 |
| Date: | 2026-11-10 05:18:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAG7L5+6kgn+33MzEDf6PrVomWTJdxyvibuMGJQZi0UmY6ptjnA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Shihao,
I reviewed v1 patches on master with assertions enabled. All
pgcrypto regression tests pass. Without 0001, all three new cases produce
ciphertext; with it, they raise the expected error.
I found no blocking issues. Looks good to me.
This makes some inputs that work today fail, so I'd keep it to master.
> I can do back-branch versions if a committer wants it back-patched.
>
I agree with keeping this on master. Back-patching would make previously
accepted malformed integer options fail across the PGP functions.
Thanks,
Sho
--
=======================================
*Sho Ito (Sean)*
E-mail: i(dot)sho(dot)0628(at)gmail(dot)com
LinkedIn: *https://www.linkedin.com/in/sho-ito-0628/
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/sho-ito-0628/>*
GitHub: https://github.com/sean0628/
=======================================
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-11-10 06:10:42 | Re: BUG #19849: queries fail after ANALYZE with expression stats on arrays |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-11-10 04:35:17 | Re: BUG #19841: SQL/JSON RETURNING coercion to GUC-dependent types (timestamptz etc.) is wrongly judged IMMUTABLE - |