>
> On 2020-03-12 16:35:15 +0800, Pengzhou Tang wrote:
> > When reading the grouping sets codes, I find that the additional size of
> > the hash table for hash aggregates is always zero, this seems to be
> > incorrect to me, attached a patch to fix it, please help to check.
>
> Indeed, that's incorrect. Causes the number of buckets for the hashtable
> to be set higher - the size is just used for that. I'm a bit wary of
> changing this in the stable branches - could cause performance changes?
>
>
thanks for confirming this.