From: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Passing values to a dynamic background worker |
Date: | 2017-04-18 20:00:48 |
Message-ID: | CAG1_KcCZEmwx9ShiEk6ZwfeJqOg3sm_arrStY6bU25E61fM6NQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/17/17 16:19, Keith Fiske wrote:
> > I've reached a roadblock in that bgw_main_arg can only accept a single
> > argument that must be passed by value for a dynamic bgw. I already
> > worked around this for passing the database name to the my existing use
> > of a bgw with doing partition maintenance (pass a simple integer to use
> > as an index array value). But I'm not sure how to do this for passing
> > multiple values in.
>
> You can also store this kind of information in a table.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
True, but that seemed like the easy way out. :) Trying to find ways to
learn internals better through projects I'm actively working on.
Keith
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-04-18 21:06:38 | Re: Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-18 19:57:09 | Re: Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans |