Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue

From: Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in>
To: Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue
Date: 2012-02-02 07:50:59
Message-ID: CAFrxt0ihguq0xMYT9NDXj2DxQ7xZHnK8BnHX5br_S-WtUoH-GQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

synchronous_commit is "on"

Thanks
VB

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Raghavendra <
raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> What is the value of synchronous_commit ?
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Raghavendra
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> Blog: http://raghavt.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was testing the Postgres-9.1.1 synchronous streaming replication on our
>> UAT system.
>>
>> Without synchronous replication, everything was working fine.
>>
>> But, when i enabled synchronous_replication_names='*', the "create table"
>> started hanging for long time.
>>
>> When i pressed "Ctrl+C" i got the following message -
>>
>> Cancel request sent
>> WARNING: canceling wait for synchronous replication due to user request
>> DETAIL: The transaction has already committed locally, but might not
>> have been replicated to the standby.
>> CREATE TABLE
>>
>> Can someone please help us ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> VB
>>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2012-02-02 09:32:22 Re: Audtiting, DDL and DML in same SQL Function
Previous Message Gregg Jaskiewicz 2012-02-02 07:23:01 Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?