Re: Wrong query plan when using a left outer join

From: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wrong query plan when using a left outer join
Date: 2012-01-17 19:13:45
Message-ID: CAFnxYwj=cBL2+TUfJt1o4_2aPJ=+et2OdrKGxgoTxq8-Jso6Ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

2012/1/17 Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> postgres will still try to choose best execution plan. seq scan may simply be
> faster here. breaking point is somewhere near 50% selectivity.

The tipping point is usually far lower than that; in fact, it's more
often around 10%. Random IO is *very* expensive, as compared to
sequential IO (at least on spinning rust; SSDs are a different matter,
of course). It's usually vastly cheaper to read in an entire table
and filter the rows you want than to seek left and right (and then
left, left, and right again) to cherry-pick the pages you need.

rls

--
:wq

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Gendler 2012-01-18 07:22:13 Re: UPDATE COMPATIBILITY
Previous Message Feike Steenbergen 2012-01-17 18:55:55 Re: Wrong query plan when using a left outer join