Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography

From: Filip Janus <fjanus(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography
Date: 2025-10-30 10:39:38
Message-ID: CAFjYY++_eihHzuMTGVAw+kU-01OwtHSPWUFZjfwZoGM2stzmXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for posting it there. If I understand correctly, the resolution
should be to use internal hash algorithms — in this case, SHAKE.
Now, the question is whether to wait for the implementation of a public API
to make the change as general as possible, or to try implementing it on the
PG side?

-Filip-

st 29. 10. 2025 v 6:17 odesílatel Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
napsal:

> I posted (including your attachment, by accident, since at first I was
> going to forward your post) about this to the IETF TLS WG mailing list.
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CEaZg1l-4iVg0_wdEr5_rXfGYWc/
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-10-30 10:49:46 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-10-30 10:36:25 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread